Welcome to First Place Realty 650-2514 Sign in | Help

DailyStats.ca

Fair and balanced comment on the Calgary real estate market from Bob Truman and Dailystats.ca
Peak price for this year: Has it already happened?

For the past three years, we've reached our peak average price for the calendar year as follows:
2008: May(followed by a decline of 9%)
2007: July( "               "                    6%)
2006: June("               "                    2%)

On June 4, we reached our peak average price for 2009 at $443,982. Will that be it for this year? If not, when?

The median price seems to have hit a plateau at $390,000. It's been there for about three weeks.

The one big difference this year is inventory. This year it's dropping, whereas in 2006-2007, it was increasing. In 2008, it started dropping in June, but it was almost double what we have this year.

I hope that inventory starts to increase for a couple reasons:
1. I have clients who have sold their homes and can't find anything worth buying right now.
2. Prices have to stabilize or go down if the market is to remain healthy. With higher interest rates on their way, the sales will dry up if prices continue to rise. Higher inventory will put some downward presure on prices and keep the wheels turning.

Other factors this year are increasing unemployment and increasing interest rates(albeit still low). For sellers, is the window of opportunity going to disappear soon?

Posted: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:59 AM by Bob Truman

Comments

Bob Truman said:

High-priced homes are selling better than in 2008.

 

It's not just the first-time buyers who are purchasing homes this month. So far in June, sales of homes over $600,000 are up 20% over last year.

 

In May, sales in this price range were 8% lower than in May 2008. For the period Jan 1 - May 31, sales were down 39%.

# June 18, 2009 8:23 AM

Bob Truman said:

For the period June 1 - 17, single family home sales are up 28% compared to 2008.

Compared to the historical average, going back to the year 2000, sales are up 14%.

# June 18, 2009 8:36 AM

Peter said:

Good luck !!!!!

# June 18, 2009 8:01 PM

Vladimir Levin said:

I have a feeling the Calgary market has a bit more jump in it left for this summer, based on the fact that during the winter a lot of people who would have been in the market otherwise decided to wait and see what would happen with the world economy and oil prices. I suspect that those who have not been laid off already probably feel relatively optimistic about things getting better and therefore have made the plunge already or will do so in the coming months. So I think June may see more price increases. Overall though I my prediction for the next year or so is a fairly balanced market without any significant price spikes - and that probably will hold true for the foreseeable future since improvements in the economy would be offset my increases in interest rates from the current historic lows...

# June 18, 2009 8:49 PM

Bob Truman said:

"during the winter a lot of people who would have been in the market otherwise decided to wait and see what would happen with the world economy and oil prices."

Six months ago we were all speculating whether there was any pent-up demand. We have our answer now.

Kendall took buyers to a new listing today in the SW priced at $524,900. He reports there were eight showings already.  

# June 18, 2009 11:01 PM

worldclass said:

Why is there such demand for Calgary homes at these prices?  I must say that this surprises me, since I still think a vast majority of homes are priced too high.  Where is the sales mix Bob?  Is it more inner city or just all over the place?

All I think is that purchasers who must make a purchase should buy quality real estate that they can both live in and "invest" in.  Inner city homes with large land in a non-flooding location with good access to transit and main roads is what I would think is the best value.

Still, overall the market surprises me and I am sure it surprises everyone else too (bull or bear).  The market is as the market does.  I am still worried about the over-arching theme of inflationary pressures created by government and central banks.  Deflation is what SHOULD be happening, but inflation is what our politicians will end up causing (much to the detriment of our monetary system and, by extension, society).

# June 19, 2009 3:20 PM

Answer On said:

Quality (or maybe I should say - decent) real estate in the inner city on a big lot starts at $750k-$800k. Now as the average and median suggest, most people can't afford that, as a matter of fact some can barely afford the average/median no matter the location. If you ask me, best value average household in Calgary can get for the money is the area in  between inner city and suburbs. Lots are still decent in size, houses are bigger and newer and prices are reasonable for today's market.  

# June 19, 2009 4:19 PM

Mike said:

Interest rate. The main reason why people buy, but we will see what happen next.

# June 19, 2009 7:29 PM

Bob Truman said:

"Where is the sales mix Bob?  Is it more inner city or just all over the place?"

For the 30-day period May 20 - Jun 18, here are the sales compared to 2008(includes SFH and condos):

Area of city

Increase

NW 'burbs

+32%

Inner city

+29%

SW 'burbs

+26%

SE 'burbs

+17%

NE 'burbs

+12%

Entire city

+23%

# June 20, 2009 8:38 PM

Bob Truman said:

"Kendall took buyers to a new listing today in the SW priced at $524,900. He reports there were eight showings already."

Update: This home was conditionally sold the next day.  

Over the past week, 31 single family homes sold within their first 2 days on the market.

# June 21, 2009 8:20 AM

Vinny said:

Interestingly I think things have definitely turned the corner...at least for now.

My friend in Vancouver has been trying to buy a place for the last month.  He said up until March things were dead but after April things suddenly heated up.  He had to bid on two places and got the second place he bid on.  He would have paid about 60k (10%) less had he bought back in March.

From what I have heard in Regina , you get a mixed bag of stories there. Some people say it's hot right now but I have a friend who's been trying to sell their condo since last winter and they've knocked off 50k (15%) already.

# June 21, 2009 8:54 AM

Frnk said:

Builders must be having some financial difficulty in getting new loans. This week there are some excellent pricing on small builder homes in a few high end communities. I suspect they're trying to reduce inventory ratios to accommodate financing requirements.

# June 21, 2009 11:09 PM

Bob Truman said:

Frnk, new homes in the inner city, where I follow them more closely, have really taken a hit over the past year. The average sales price per sq ft is down 17%. There's still inventory to clear out, and builders are not yet buying tear-down houses in any numbers in order to build more.

A 17% decrease would translate into a saving of $136,000 on a home that was priced at $800,000 last year.

# June 22, 2009 8:34 AM

worldclass said:

This is very true, I have seen some nice previously high priced homes in the inner city reduce their prices significantly.  It's a shame they are on half the land size (as they are likely on a subdivided previously 50ft lot).  But that's the way the cookie crumbles.

# June 22, 2009 3:59 PM

Bob Truman said:

How many homes are selling for less than the previous purchase price?

For SFH homes sold Jun 21-22, 2009

Total Sales 106

Sold price Jun 2009

Purchase Price

$ Change

% Difference

Year Purchased

1

475000

545000

-70000

-13%

2008

2

330000

378000

-48000

-13%

2007

3

289000

322000

-33000

-10%

2006

4

440000

475000

-35000

-7%

2007

5

475000

491000

-16000

-3%

2006

6

382000

381500

500

0%

2008

7

497000

495000

2000

0%

2007

8

288000

273100

14900

5%

2006

9

349000

330000

19000

6%

2007

10

341000

322000

19000

6%

2006

11

329000

297500

31500

11%

2006

12

640000

560000

80000

14%

2006

13

477000

373900

103100

28%

2006

14

540000

395000

145000

37%

2005

15

440000

318000

122000

38%

2005

16

390500

280000

110500

39%

2005

17

280000

188500

91500

49%

2005

18

335000

224100

110900

49%

2005

19

324500

211000

113500

54%

2005

20

452000

289900

162100

56%

2005

21

183000

115500

67500

58%

2005

In the above table, it shows 13 homes purchased in the years 2006-2008. 5 of them sold for less than the purchase price.

# June 23, 2009 8:17 AM

Calgary_groceries said:

Nice blog.

1. I have clients who have sold their homes and can't find anything worth buying right now.

2. Prices have to stabilize or go down if the market is to remain healthy. With higher interest rates on their way, the sales will dry up if prices continue to rise. Higher inventory will put some downward presure on prices and keep the wheels turning

On #1)  That is correct.  Houses are $200K OVER their real worth.

#2)  Prices go down?  Ya think?  Hopefully interest rates go up to 15%.  That will fix the problems of this current bubble pricing.  Then maybe all the renters who qualify now will choose to buy.  No way IM spending $400K on a house worth $180K.

# June 23, 2009 9:50 AM

Luke said:

"No way IM spending $400K on a house worth $180K."

That statement always drives me nuts.  How much is something worth?  As much as someone is willing to pay for it.  Where did you get $180K from???  maybe once in a while, there is an overpriced house, but judging by the latest numbers, not many of them.

Or are you saying the replacement cost is $180k?  Once again, you are wrong.  You can get a lot of 2-3 year old houses, which are cheaper, then what new homes are selling for.

# June 23, 2009 4:02 PM

Mike said:

To Luke:

"As much as someone is willing to pay for it".Yes you right!!! But how is life under the plains in inner city for 800K house? well done!!!

# June 24, 2009 1:43 PM

Jimmy said:

Great blog. The untold story in Calgary is builder sentiment. Once you look at housing starts going back a few years and consider the law of supply and demand, you can easily explain our market pattern and make predictions for the next year or so.

Builders overbuilt in 05/06/07 and most of 08 and then basically stopped completely. We got a massive inventory overhang last spring (well before the downturn) and a constant drop in inventory this year. Now that people see their choices limited, they start getting nervous and paying more. Inventory will get very low this fall. If construction picks up this summer this will only affect inventory well into next year.

Our economy is in a different class from almost anywhere in North America so usual house index and rent:sale prices don't really apply as well. (Just look at average Calgary wages and employment participation for an eye opener). Keep in mind everything is relative -would you rather live in Ontario with unemployment near 10% and a heavy manufacturing base or Calgary at 6.6%. Yes natural gas matters but the price of oil at 60-70 reminds other Canadians of 3 years ago. The price of oil was almost 10 in the eighties and interest rates were near 20%.

Inflation is a bit of a friend to Calgary real estate - price of commodities goes up and so does oil. Interest rate increases of 3-4% should cool things off definitely though. We won't see that happen in the near future though. Timing that is the biggest uncertainty in my mind.

Bob why do you think building activity is not picking up yet - is credit still too thin? Are builders bankrupt?

BTW Peak price for this year has not been established yet.

# June 24, 2009 3:31 PM

Bob Truman said:

"Bob why do you think building activity is not picking up yet - is credit still too thin? Are builders bankrupt?"

Most of the builders in the inner city are small guys. In an uncertain market, they will not start a new home until their present inventory is sold. Interesting that you asked that question because I noticed a new home going up in Hillhurst yesterday by a builder who's done nothing for the past year, but seems to be entering the fray again.

I think a lot of them had plenty of land on hand as well, so the sales of old tear-down homes dried up. When we see 50' lots moving again, we'll know the inventory of new homes is getting low.

There is one well-known inner-city builder who has continued to do lots of business over the past year. You see his signs everywhere. He told me that his business has decreased slightly, but that his SHARE of the business has increased considerably.

When you look at buying a 50' lot to develop with two infills, it's too scary for the small guys to invest $500,000 - $600,000 in land, and another $700,000 in building costs for a sale that may take months or even years. It would cost at least $5,000 per month to service that debt. Your profit will get eaten up pretty fast.  -Bob

# June 25, 2009 7:23 AM

John said:

To "worldclass"'s comment, it's a shame to see a 50ft lot got chopped into 1/2. There are some high-end houses sitting on a 50+ ft lot in Spruce Cliff that are really nice. I hope all inner-city houses are like that.

# June 30, 2009 12:57 PM
Leave a Comment

(required)

(required)

(optional)

(required)

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS