Welcome to First Place Realty 650-2514 Sign in | Help
Inventory is approaching the danger zone

The May numbers are in the books(see below). Everyone underestimated the activity and the price increases this spring. The low interest rates along with prices which started out the year 10% lower than last year, has resulted in a price increase and a sales volume increase.

It was mentioned a number of times late last year that there were buyers lurking, but no one seemed ready to take the plunge. May was the month where they returned with a vengeance. We heard that the end of 0 down/40-year mortgages would put an end to the first-time buyers. Who is buying all these homes priced under $400,000?(Sales up 46% in May) 

I've told every one of my buyers that I expected prices to go down this year. A young couple who bought in Scenic Acres back in February are very happy they didn't listen to me. Since they purchased their house, the median price in Calgary has gone up $15,000(or 4%). Even more importantly, the selection of homes has rapidly shrunk and deteriorated.

There was a 171 day supply of homes in Feb in Scenic Acres, today there is a 40 day supply. They bought when prices were down, selection was excellent, and they still had lots of negotiating power. They got the house with all the features they wanted. 

This scenario was repeated numerous times with buyers earlier this spring, but not anymore. Inventory is approaching the danger zone now that it's under 4,000. There's not a lot of quality product available, and when an attractive listing comes on the market, it sells fast.

For the buyers who haven't yet bought, I'm still saying selection is going to get better, and the summer will bring lower prices. Will the next three months prove me correct, or will I have a lot of irate buyers who waited too long?

May 2009 stats summary:

The median price of single family homes(SFH) at $390,000 is up $10,000 or 2.6% from Apr.  It's down 6.9% from May 2008 when it was $419,000.

The SFH average price at $436,427 is up $10,116 or 2.4% compared to Apr. It's down 9.0% from May 2008 when it was $479,564.

SFH sales price per sq ft at $279 was up $7, or 2.6% compared to Apr. 

Sales of single family homes were up 16% compared to May 2008. 

SFH Inventory on May 31 was 3860, which is 46% lower than last year. 

New listings at 2236 were down 35% compared to last year.

The absorption rate of 2.4 means that we have a 2.4 month supply of homes on the market. Last year, there was a 5.2 month supply. For homes under $400,000, there is a 1.6 month supply. You can see the absorption rate by price range here.

Days on Market(DOM) decreased from 52 in Apr to 46 in May. Last year, it was 42.

36 homes sold for $1 million or more. Last year, there were 49.

Price reductions are down 63% compared to last year. We've averaged 57 price reductions per day over the past week. Last year was 153.

29% of the homes listed in May already have a sale or a conditional sale. Last year, it was 13%.

The median price of condos at $255,000 is up $4,000 or 1.6% from Apr.

The median price of condos is down 10.5% compared to last year.

Condo sales at 653 were up 13% compared to May 2008.

Posted: Friday, June 05, 2009 9:37 AM by Bob Truman

Comments

Bob Truman said:

 Hot – Medium - Cool

As you can see from the table below, sales in some communities are on fire, and others are so-so.

For example, an absorption rate of .6 in Varsity translates into an 18-day supply of homes on the market. For Ogden-Lynnwood, the rate of 5.5 translates into a 165-day supply.

When I did this table two months ago, Bowness was at 16.7(501-day supply of homes). Today, it's down to 2.5(75-day supply).

Absorption Rates for randomly selected communities for the period May 5 – Jun 3, 2009. Single family homes
Red = Seller’s market
Green = Balanced market

Blue = Buyer’s market

 

Varsity

0.6

Coventry Hills                  

0.8

Collingwood, Charleswood

0.9

Haysboro                      

1.0

Silver Springs

1.1

McKenzie Towne            

1.2

Scenic Acres                   

1.3

Cougar Ridge                

1.3

Canyon Meadows             

1.4

Evergreen                      

1.4

Douglasdale Estates        

1.7

Tuscany                      

1.9

Dalhousie

1.9

Rundle, Pineridge, etc      

2.2

Royal Oak                     

2.3

Bowness                    

2.5

Glendale, Glenbrook       

3.2

Strathcona Park               

3.2

West Springs                 

3.6

Queensland                

4.0

Renfrew, Bridgeland 

4.6

Wildwood                      

5.0

Tuxedo, Mt Pleasant       

5.3

Lynnwood, Ogden        

5.5

# June 5, 2009 9:44 AM

CM said:

Interest rates = nowhere to go but up

Price of oil = seems to be stabilizing.  Is the price rational ?  Based on fundamentals or speculation?

Price of nat gas = still in the doldrums.  Probably more relevant for Alberta than the price of oil.

Canadian dollar = rising

TSX = rising

Mortgage arrears = rising

'New Housing' price index = dropping

Unemployment rate = rising (both in Alberta and the rest of the country)

Price of rent in Calgary = stable

Home price / rent ratios = still historically out of whack by about 30%  (long term trend is 15.0, currently sitting at 20, our peak was 25)

Case-Schiller index for Canada & Calgary = still dropping.  Indications are that Calgary 'peaked' in mid '07, unlike Toronto which were mid-late '08.

These are the facts as I know them, people can draw their own conclusions. Personally I thought we would have seen the market drop out by early april, and well, here we are, so my predictions obviously mean nothing :)

# June 5, 2009 11:04 AM

Mike said:

Good news !!! Houses 500k and up must sell too!!! Of course for ADJUSTMENT price or out of the market. And new home builders will start clouse the gap.

# June 5, 2009 12:17 PM

Green said:

June will be a very hot month for sales.  Now that 5 year fixed mortgage rates have risen slightly, everyone with lower rates locked in will pull the trigger on a deal.  And, as usual, July and August will be very slow.  If you want to sell your home, get it on the market asap.

# June 5, 2009 2:05 PM

Ping said:

@CM - Are your calculations on Home Price/Rent ratio based on single family housing or Condo strata? I am interested in your source of your calculation. Thanks.

# June 5, 2009 3:40 PM

joe sixpack said:

You are 100% correct CM!! Your predictions do mean nothing, obviously.

# June 5, 2009 4:53 PM

CM said:

@ping: My calculations for home price to rent ratio are based on SFH, although it would be pretty easy for one to calculate it for condos.

Here's my method...

Go to rentfaster.ca and do an advanced search for every SFH for rent in Calgary.  Here's the output:

http://tinyurl.com/dccdb4

Make note of the median rental price (currently $1650)

Now I simply take the median price of SFH's in Calgary (currently 390,000) and plug it into the equation.

390,000 / (1650 x 12)= 19.7

Let's see what we have for condos...

Rentfaster: http://tinyurl.com/m75cpl

Median condo rental cost = $1400

Median condo sale price = 255,000

price to rent ratio = 15.2

# June 5, 2009 8:40 PM

CM said:

Median rental prices for Calgary, as of June 5

SFH: $1650

Condo: $1400

2 bedroom apartment: $1150

Could be an interesting stat to watch.  

# June 5, 2009 8:54 PM

Steve said:

Er, to all those hurling invective at the poor saps who are still buying homes, you do realize that those are the folks who are keeping this economy from completely tanking. If everyone suddenly stopped buying real estate, home values would plummet to near zero, and this gossamer thin recovery would turn into a depression the likes from which we may never recover. So, to all those generous, kind-hearted folks loading up on overpriced real-estate–bless you. You’re the reason I still I have a job, an internet connection and a sliver of hope.

# June 5, 2009 9:47 PM

Bob Truman said:

A reminder to all the new readers of this blog: don't forget to check my What's New page for all the latest news on Calgary's housing market. You'll find interesting information such as...

Jun 6
There were 87 sales of single family homes yesterday. 24 were sold during their first 7 days on the market.

Jun 6
Over the past 3 days, 21 homes sold at list price or higher: McKenzie Towne(3), Hidden Valley, Silver Springs, Deer Run, Evanston, Panorama Hills, Springbank Hill, Auburn Bay, Douglasdale, Erlton, Willow Park Estates, Chaparral, Lake Bonavista Estates, Hawkwood, Tuscany, Banff Trail, Shawnessy, Chinook Park, Martindale.

Jun 5
Sales of homes in May under $500,000 were 25% higher than last year. Sales of homes over $600,000 were 8% lower.

Jun 5
Over the past 10 years, the average number of single family home sales in May is 1619. This year, with 1568 sales, we were 3% below the long-term average.

Jun 4
A home in Erlton sold for $100,150 over list price yesterday. A total of 7 homes sold over list price with an average overbid of 3.4%.

# June 6, 2009 6:22 AM

Bob Truman said:

Where are sales up the most? Where are prices down the least?

For the 30 days ending on Jun 5, 2009, for single family homes:
(For the entire city, SFH price was down 8%. Sales volume was up 26%.)

Area

Change in Sales Price per Sq Ft Compared to 2008*

Change in Sales Volume Compared to 2008**

Inner City

-7%

+41%

NW suburbs

-6%

+30%

SW suburbs

-10%

+20%

NE suburbs

-11%

+13%

SE suburbs

-8%

+33%

*Based on 2-storey homes
**Includes all styles of homes

 

# June 6, 2009 7:16 AM

worldclass said:

It looks as though we are seeing a small bounce back in our real estate market.  Whether this is due to fundamental reason is moot, however you look at it.

There is one thing that is clear however, and that is the rates are going to start rising sooner than we think, and believe it or not....the central banks will do whatever they can to keep the rates low.  We won't be seeing 3% jump to 10% any time soon.... we will however see a gradual rise over a few years to 5% IF AND ONLY IF the world economy really is "coming back".

The price of oil is sky high due to speculation that there will be inflation in the USD currency in the near future.  It may actually become a self-fulfilling prophecy in this case.  The Bank of Canada, meanwhile, has telegraphed its intentions to keep our Loonie flying low and will institute the means necessary to make sure we don't have too strong of a currency compared to the USD.  What does this mean?  Inflation in our currency, and thereby inflation in all things essential (food, base metals, energy, shelter).  The west will be strong with the resource industry whether we like it or not....and it looks as though Calgary may get another jolt back to life.

It won't be the heyday of 2006-2007 thankfully.  Maybe we will finally get a moderation of our economic activity (not too hot, not too cold).  I don't know about you folks, but even though I saw a lot of these job losses coming to Calgary, I was still sad to see fellow Calgarians lose their jobs.  Especially friends of mine.

Let's see what this market brings next.

For the record... Truman's chart above shows a large increase in sales volume within the "inner city" area.  I have been trumpeting this all along.... that, if you can, you should try to purchase in the inner-city (a good neighborhood though, like Scarboro, Killarney, Altadore which is excellent, Elboya, etc).  The lot sizes are larger, and you get the value of location.  A big box out in the suburbs on half the land size just won't shelter you as much from a big downturn (which is always still possible....though the possibility is diminishing).

# June 6, 2009 8:43 AM

worldclass said:

I'd like to add to my previous post as well, that in no way do I mean to offend homeowners in far-flung suburbs.  If you like the home you're living in, then so be it.  I was speaking strictly on the investment side of things.

If you have to buy, and can live in a smaller older home.... then think inner city.  Unless you have the money for a new inner city infill.

# June 6, 2009 8:48 AM

Mike said:

Hi Bob,

Now we can see Evergreen SW in a sellers market( 1.4).OK? If we count on MLS map there about 82 house on sale. 21 houses-range 250K-400K,13 houses-  400K-450K,48 houses-450K and up!!! Soon or later houses for 250K-400k will sold, 400K-450K maybe to but slower. And my question: What happen with 48 houses 450K and up? ..... Which market will be ?!!!!!

# June 6, 2009 10:10 AM

Vinny said:

Bob, That hot/cold list is pretty neat.  Can you tell me what this would be for Somerset, Bridlewood, Whitehorn and Monterey Park?  Some of those might already be included in another one of your listed areas.  Thanks

Like many of you I didn't think this spring would be as strong as it has been.  The most surprising thing has been lack of inventory.  I've told one of my friends not to buy until Fall.  One thing I didn't expect was the drop of interest rates. My friends have been watching prices go up every month.  Hopefully they don't end up hating me.

# June 6, 2009 10:25 AM

worldclass said:

Mike,

The market of 450k and up will be those who can afford it....and some of them will be those who have overstretched themselves to afford it, but find themselves house-poor.

# June 6, 2009 4:18 PM

Bob Truman said:

Vinny, here you go:

Absorption Rate

Price Change

Somerset

1.0

-4%

Bridlewood

2.1

-8%

Whitehorn

2.1

NA*

Monterey Park

3.6

-12%

 *There weren't enough sales of the same-style home to get a meaningful number for Whitehorn

# June 6, 2009 7:14 PM

Frnk said:

I think the 4% price rise is due to seasonal strength buoyed by low inventory. I expect prices to correct about 10% by the end of the year. We'll see median of 369K before years end.

I do find the low inventory to be an interesting phenomenon. The only reason I can attribute this lower inventory rate is that the majority of Calgary residents who owned homes prior to the 2006 run-up used existing equity to put a purchase deposit down on a newer home.

The glut of inventory in 2007/2008 was because both the new home and the older home were put on the market at the same time. When none of the houses sold, the sellers decided to rent one home out. There is no other comprehensible reason for inventory to drop this low from a high of 8000+ listings last year. The purchase price of these new homes in 2006 was about 30% lower than current value, so even with the recent drop these families are still doing very well on their purchase. With homes rented out with positive cash flow, there's no incentive to sell.

The most important data is the unemployment numbers. If the recent trend in layoffs and low paying job creation continues, does that indicate these rental properties will come to market next year?

# June 6, 2009 7:46 PM

Bob Truman said:

Homes sold for less than purchase price
Jun 5-6, 2009
Total SFH sales: 119

 

Previous purchase date

# Sold

# Sold for less

2006

15

5

 

 

 

2007

6

4

 

 

 

2008

6

3

 

 

 

Total

27

12

# June 7, 2009 8:17 AM

The optimistic one said:

We are seeing this for the third year in a row, prices go up in the first half of the year, people think they will keep going up and that the correction is over, then  prices will go down in the last half of the year. The last two years prices ended up significantly down for the year.

When will people get it!!!

# June 7, 2009 8:21 PM

worldclass said:

Those who don't get it aren't very cognizant of the real estate market.  Prices should fall from here on throughout the year, as they always do.

There may be a bump in sales though with the news of rising interest rates.  However, if the economic news is not good for the rest of the year, look to the USA to continue running the printing presses and for the rest of the western world to follow suit.  In such cases, rates will stay low for the foreseeable future.

Those buying now might be willing to pay more for choice and selection.

# June 8, 2009 8:05 AM

Mike said:

worldclass:

How the Canadian government will keep canadian dollar low when the oil going up? It's the same trik like they did with the housing market?

# June 8, 2009 10:44 AM

worldclass said:

Mike,

They've already signaled that they are "watching the loonie", meaning that they do not want parity or greater....they prefer a lower Loonie because we are stuck in the mindset that we have to produce for the consumption of the USA.  Why we can't produce for our own consumption baffles me.

How will they keep the dollar low?  They've already started doing that... by running ever larger defiicits...by quantitative easing policies, etc.  If we maintained fiscal prudency, our Loonie would be at parity right now...but because we've followed suit with the USA and had mini bailouts of our banking system (via "injecting liquidity") and carmakers, our Loonie is flying lower.

# June 8, 2009 4:06 PM

Ping said:

Just watch what oil prices do over the next 6 months. I suspect it will be down since the contango is not happening as much and there's lots of supply at sea. It all depends on consumption this summer.

There are speculators out there trying to buy cheaper oil in US$ and then they buy CAN$ to hedge against the US$ for most commodities based economy. Bouncing the currencies back and forth while the Canadian govt tries to keep our economy competitive with the US. Our backs are almost against the corner with interest rates so low. The other option includes printing more money but the deficit idea is definitely clever.

Watch for more govt spending in the horizon. For those of you subscribing to the baby boomers theory, it will be interesting what they will do to real estate and the stock market. They certainly cannot depend on GICs rates at this point for monthly income. Something has to capitulate.

# June 9, 2009 9:28 AM

Frnk said:

Anyone have a reliable site that gives historical data on housing rental vacancies. I notice more for rent signs posted as I drive around.

# June 10, 2009 6:34 AM

Bob Truman said:

C’mon people, list your house!

The price level for the seller's market has taken a huge leap in the past 10 days. Homes listed below $550,000 are now at a 51-day supply. On May 29, the seller's market price level was $439,000.

There's one school of thought(mine included) which says beginning next month, inventory is going to climb and prices will level off or drop for the remainder of the year.

If you are thinking of selling, and your house is priced under $550,000 this is probably going to be the best time to do so.

If you're a buyer, I expect you'll get a better selection, less competition, and a lower price if you can hold off for a while.

# June 10, 2009 8:17 AM

Dan said:

Very good, honest advice. Thanks Bob.

# June 10, 2009 8:30 AM

Bob Truman said:

Regarding  the seller's market, I'm now receiving calls from potential clients who need a realtor who can "respond quickly."

A familiar refrain, "by the time my realtor made arrangements to view the property, it was already sold."

# June 10, 2009 8:30 AM

Bob Truman said:

The uncertainty of Calgary's housing market can best be illustrated with the results of my recent online poll:

Question: Compared to May, the median price in Dec 2009 will be?:

The answers are evenly divided among all four of the possibilities:

*10% or more lower
*5% lower
*About the same
*Higher
# June 10, 2009 8:50 AM

Bob Truman said:

Urgently Wanted

I received this email today:

“we are desperately looking for a house which is walking distance to a catholic school (kinder to k-?).

price range up to 350k.

2 or 3 bedroom will do.

Apartment style or townhouse is acceptable as long as there is underground parking and not too expensive condo fee.

Prefer SW

Thanks for your help.”

If anyone has a property which fits this buyer’s criteria, give me a call 403-650-2514 or send me an email: bobtruman@shaw.ca

# June 10, 2009 2:04 PM

Bob Truman said:

This email came from a mortgage broker today:

With so many people rushing to lock in fixed rates, many lenders are seeing record volumes.  As a result, underwriting delays are widespread. 

In many cases, application turnaround times are five or more business days.  We’ve heard reports of certain low-rate lenders with two week backlogs in their queues. 

# June 12, 2009 8:19 AM

Newt said:

It seems to me that we are setting up for a housing disaster.  This whole rush in while we can afford it and don't ask any questions about the future.... hopefully it works for people but I have my doubts.

# June 12, 2009 9:58 AM

Jeff said:

Mortgages are the single biggest financial drain on society the way they are structered causes the consumers to waste tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars in extra interest payments.

If you have a decent downpayment there are way better vehicals to allow you to finance a house where your not structered into a 90% interest 10% princaple ripoff that the banks try to tell you is the only way.

# June 12, 2009 10:31 AM

Bob Truman said:

Sal Guatieri, senior economist with BMO Capital Markets, in a research report released Friday:

"Record-low mortgage rates have unleashed pent-up demand that accumulated last year when previously soaring prices closed the door on first-time buyers"

"the data support our long-held view that the Canadian market is merely correcting, not busting."

Read more in the Herald Housing market blossoms in spring

# June 13, 2009 11:56 AM

Frnk said:

@Jeff

If you have a decent downpayment there are way better vehicals to allow you to finance a house where your not structered into a 90% interest 10% princaple ripoff that the banks try to tell you is the only way.

----

I agree with the ripoff statement. Could you elaborate on other vehicles?

# June 14, 2009 4:38 PM

Jeff said:

I really don't feel comfortable just tossing out what it is for two reasons.

1. it's structered much more freely so if you do not have a financial plan of action in place you can get yourself in alot of trouble.

2. It's not necessarly better for everyone in every situation.

If your interested i am sure you can find information online, I don't want to turn bob's blog into a shameless plug for me. Just wanted to make people aware there are alternatives.

# June 15, 2009 2:00 PM
Leave a Comment

(required)

(required)

(optional)

(required)

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS